Thomistic Noetics, Peter Hoenen & the GEOMETOR Symbolic Engine¶
Why Thirteenth-Century Scholastic Epistemology Illuminates Symbolic Computation
Modern dynamic geometry systems typically split into two disconnected worlds: numerical canvas tools (such as GeoGebra) that approximate coordinates in IEEE-754 floating-point arithmetic, and purely syntactic proof assistants that manipulate symbolic tokens with no native spatial intuition.
GEOMETOR unites both worlds through an architecture remarkably isomorphic to the Aristotelian-Thomistic noetics recovered by Fr. Peter Hoenen, S.J. in geometor-hoenen:
Thomistic Concept |
Classical Locus in |
Computational Realization in GEOMETOR |
|---|---|---|
Materia intelligibilis (continuous spatial extension free of sensible noise) |
Super Boetium De Trinitate q. 5, a. 3; In VII Metaph. lect. 10–11 |
|
Conversio ad phantasmata & terminari ad imaginationem |
In III De Anima lect. 12 (#777); Super Boetium De Trinitate q. 6, a. 2 |
|
Non demonstrat per lineam in pulvere descriptam |
In I Anal. Post. lect. 19 |
Separation between finite screen pixels and the exact symbolic identity verified in |
Dignitates, suppositiones, & petitiones |
In I Anal. Post. lect. 5 & lect. 18–19 |
|
Divisio figurarum in actu (heuristic discovery by dividing continua) |
In IX Metaph. lect. 10 (Cathala #1894) |
|