X316

DROUSSENT PIVOT

< A B C >: Reference Triangle △ABC [ A B ]: Sideline AB (Base c = 1) [ B C ]: Sideline BC (Side a) [ C A ]: Sideline CA (Side b) { 621, 622 }: Central Line L(621, 622) { 4, 69 }: Central Line L(4, 69) { 30, 99 }: Central Line L(30, 99) { 2, 187 }: Central Line L(2, 187) { 15, 303 }: Central Line L(15, 303) A = Vertex A (0.0000, 0.0000) B = Vertex B (1.0000, 0.0000) C = Vertex C (0.6122, 0.5999) X_621 = ANTICOMPLEMENT OF X(15) (0.5084, 0.2242) X_622 = ANTICOMPLEMENT OF X(16) (-2.0784, -4.0479) X_4 = ORTHOCENTER (0.6122, 0.3958) X_69 = SYMMEDIAN POINT OF THE ANTICOMPLEMENTARY TRIANGLE (0.4122, 0.0654) X_30 = EULER INFINITY POINT (0.7469, 0.7481) X_99 = STEINER POINT (0.1109, 0.4322) X_2 = CENTROID (0.5374, 0.2000) X_187 = INVERSE-IN-CIRCUMCIRCLE OF X(6) (SCHOUTE CENTER) (1.1986, 1.2559) X_15 = 1st ISODYNAMIC POINT (0.5519, 0.1878) X_303 = ISOTOMIC CONJUGATE OF 2nd NAPOLEON POINT (0.6079, 0.2757) X_316 = DROUSSENT PIVOT (-0.7850, -1.9118) A B C X621 X622 X4 X69 X30 X99 X2 X187 X15 X303 X316 (a, b, c) = (5, 6, 7) | AB = 1

X316 (DROUSSENT PIVOT) constructed on acute reference triangle \((a, b, c) = (5, 6, 7)\) with unit baseline AB = \(1\).

Constructed Elements

Trilinears: \(f(a,b,c) : f(b,c,a) : f(c,a,b)\), where \(f(a,b,c) = bc(b^{4} + c^{4} - a^{4} - b^{2}c^{2})\)
Barycentrics: \(g(a,b,c) : g(b,c,a) : g(c,a,b)\), where \(g(a,b,c) = b^{4} + c^{4} - a^{4} - b^{2}c^{2}\)
Tripolars: \(a^{2} \sqrt{2(b^{2} + c^{2}) - a^{2}} : :\)
Search Value (6, 9, 13): \(11.569873852650\)
▸ Incident Central Lines17 lines

{2, 187}, {4, 69}, {15, 303}, {16, 302}, {30, 99}, {115, 385}, {148, 538}, {183, 381}, {249, 297}, {265, 290}, {298, 530}, {299, 531}, {376, 1007}, {384, 626}, {512, 850}, {524, 671}, {691, 858}

▸ Functional Relations16 relations

Notes

Let KaKbKc be the antipedal triangle of X4 (the anticomplementary triangle). The circumcircles of AKaX4, BKbX4, CKcX4 concur, other than X4, in X316. (Randy Hutson, June 27, 2018)

See Lucien Droussent, “Cubiques circulaires anallagmatiques par points réciproques ou isogonaux,” Mathesis 62 (1953) 204-215.