GC-07 · Rhombi, Trapezoids, Mixtilinear Circles & Dissections

2:1 and golden rhombi, 1:3 area-bisecting trapezoids, mixtilinear circles, and Hooper–Curry resolution

Rounding out the catalog, quadrilaterals and curvilinear touchings demonstrate how quadratic means, tangency altitudes, and Cassini’s Fibonacci identity converge on \(\phi\). Entries span Tran Quang Hung’s \(2:1\) rhombus incircle, \(60^\circ\) half-hexagon trapezoid, and equilateral mixtilinear circle; John Molokach’s golden rhombus from shifted \(1 \times 3\) rectangles; Jingcheng Tong’s root-mean-square trapezoid bisector; and the exact \(\phi\)-power resolution of the William Hooper–Paul Curry dissection paradox.

Cataloged Constructions (6)

GC-07.02 — John Molokach's Golden Rhombus from Shifted 1×3 Rectangles cO: x**2 + y**2 - 1 = 0 BA: y - 1 = 0 Golden major T1K = 1 Golden minor KA = -1/2 + sqrt(5)/2 T2 = (0, -1) R1 = (-2, 1) R6 = (2, -1) R7 = (-1, -1) B = (1/2 - sqrt(5)/2, 1) C = (-sqrt(5)/2 - 1/2, -1) D = (-1/2 + sqrt(5)/2, -1) O = (0, 0) T1 = (0, 1) K = (1, 1) A = (1/2 + sqrt(5)/2, 1) T2 R1 R6 R7 B C D O T1 K A

GC-07.02 · John Molokach’s Golden Rhombus from Shifted 1×3 Rectangles

Stack two \(3 \times 1\) rectangles RECT1 and RECT2 shifted by one unit around center O, draw unit circle cO, and draw the two tangents to cO perpendicular to outer diagonal R1R6. Together with the horizontal outer edges, they bound a golden rhombus ABCD (\(|AC|/|BD| = \phi\)) with \(|T1K|/|KA| = \phi\).
GC-07.06 — Exact φ-Limit Resolution of the Hooper–Curry Fibonacci Dissection AC: x*(-sqrt(5)/2 - 1/2) + y*(2 + sqrt(5)) = 0 Golden major AQ = sqrt(3) Golden minor QP = (-sqrt(3) + sqrt(15))/2 C = (2 + sqrt(5), 1/2 + sqrt(5)/2) D = (0, 1/2 + sqrt(5)/2) E = (sqrt(5)/2 + 3/2, 0) F = (1/2 + sqrt(5)/2, 1/2 + sqrt(5)/2) B = (2 + sqrt(5), 0) A = (0, 0) P = (sqrt(5)/2 + 3/2, 1) Q = (1/2 + sqrt(5)/2, -1/2 + sqrt(5)/2) C D E F B A P Q

GC-07.06 · Exact φ-Limit Resolution of the Hooper–Curry Fibonacci Dissection

Replace integer Fibonacci lengths \((3, 5, 8, 13)\) in the \(8 \times 8 = 64\) vs. \(5 \times 13 = 65\) dissection fallacy by exact powers \((1, \phi, \phi^2, \phi^3)\). In rectangle ABCD of width \(\phi^3\) and height \(\phi\), internal vertices Q \(= (\phi, 1/\phi)\) and P \(= (\phi^2, 1)\) lie identically on diagonal AC, forming the 4-point golden chain \(|AQ|/|QP| = |AP|/|AQ| = \phi\).