Unit III — Coincidence of Infinite Circle, Straight Line, Triangle & Sphere — Critical Commentary & Notes¶
Exact Symbolic Reconstruction, Latin Philology & Canon Reception · DI I.13–15 (1440)
I. Exact Symbolic Demonstrations of DI I.13–15¶
Sagitta Asymptotics & Radical Secants (`DI I.13 §2`): Let \(C_R\) be the circle of radius \(R > 0\) with center \(O_R = (0, R)\) tangent to the straight line \(AB\) (\(y = 0\)) at \(O = (0, 0)\), so \(x^2 + (y - R)^2 = R^2\). At fixed horizontal abscissa \(x \neq 0\) (with \(|x| \le R\)), the exact sagitta is:
\[h(x, R) = R - \sqrt{R^2 - x^2} = \frac{x^2}{R + \sqrt{R^2 - x^2}}.\]Along the secant \(x = 1\) for \(R \in \{1, 2, 4, 8\}\) (modeled in
geometor.cusa.coincidentia_circle_line), the exact symbolic heights are \(1\), \(2 - \sqrt{3} \approx 0.26795\), \(4 - \sqrt{15} \approx 0.12702\), and \(8 - 3\sqrt{7} \approx 0.06275\), with \(\lim_{R \to \infty} h(x, R) = 0\), \(\lim_{R \to \infty} R\,h(x, R) = \frac{x^2}{2}\), and curvature \(\kappa(R) = \frac{1}{R} \to 0\).Projective-Conformal Proof via Möbius Circle Inversion: Under inversion in the unit circle \(\Omega\) centered at \(S = (0, -1)\) (which fixes the point of tangency \(O = (0, 0)\)), every circle \(C_R\) of radius \(R\) maps to a bounded rational circle \(C'_R\) with exact center and radius:
\[M_R = \left(0,\; -\frac{R}{2R + 1}\right), \qquad \rho_R = \frac{R}{2R + 1}.\]Meanwhile, the straight horizon line \(y = 0\) maps to the circle \(C'_\infty\) with center \((0, -\frac{1}{2})\) and radius \(\frac{1}{2}\). Taking \(R \to \infty\) on the Riemann sphere \(\widehat{\mathbb{C}}\), \(M_R \to (0, -\frac{1}{2})\) and \(\rho_R \to \frac{1}{2}\) smoothly in Hausdorff metric: on the conformal sphere, the straight line literally IS the circle through the point at infinity (casey:sequel:1886, klein:elementary:1908).
Rational Trigonometry Proof of the Flattening Triangle (`DI I.14 §§2–3`): For the isosceles triangle \(T_n\) with fixed base \(B = (-1, 0)\), \(C = (1, 0)\) (\(Q_{\text{base}} = 4\)) and apex \(A_n = (0, \frac{1}{n})\) over \(\mathbb{Q}(n)\) (modeled in
geometor.cusa.coincidentia_triangle_lineusing Wildberger's invariants, wildberger:divine:2005):\[Q(A_n, B) = Q(A_n, C) = 1 + \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^2}, \qquad s_B = s_C = \frac{1}{n^2 + 1}, \qquad s_{A_n} = \frac{4n^2}{(n^2 + 1)^2}.\]Every \(T_n\) satisfies the Triple Spread Formula \((s_{A_n} + 2s_B)^2 - 2(s_{A_n}^2 + 2s_B^2) - 4 s_{A_n} s_B^2 = 0\) identically over \(\mathbb{Q}(n)\), while the Triple Quad Formula collinearity residual equals \((4 + 2Q_{\text{leg}})^2 - 2(16 + 2Q_{\text{leg}}^2) = \frac{16}{n^2} \to 0\) as \(n \to \infty\)!
II. Archival Scan Collation: Rotta (1913) vs. Klibansky & Paris (1514)¶
Direct multimodal inspection of McGill University Library’s digitized scan of Raymond Klibansky's <klibansky> annotated copy of Paolo Rotta's 1913 Laterza edition (cusa:rotta:1913, pp. 28 and 31; cf. cusa:heidelberg:1932) revealed two classic scribal/typesetting eye-skip omissions (*homeoteleuton*) in Rotta’s printed text, both restored in pencil in Klibansky’s own hand from the 1514 Paris and manuscript witnesses and incorporated in our Latin text:
`DI I.13 §2` (Rotta p. 28): Rotta’s typesetter jumped from the first minoris circuli to the second, omitting
et ille plus a curvitate recedit quam arcus gh adhuc minoris circuli—even though Rotta’s own marginal woodcut right beside the paragraph explicitly labels all four linesa b,c d,e f, andg h!`DI I.14 §3` (Rotta p. 31): Rotta printed
ut b d c, et superficies minor, accidentally droppingtanto minus vincunt lineae bd et dc lineam bcbetweenut bdcandet superficies minor—again restored in Klibansky’s pencil margin at the foot of page 31.
IV. Executable Symbolic Verification¶
In accordance with GEOMETOR’s strict content/code separation for historical editions, executable geometor.model SymPy constructions, Rational Trigonometry proofs, and series-error audits for Unit III live in src/geometor/cusa/ and the companion walkthrough Demonstrations.