Unit 4 Notes: Casey’s Dublin Memoirs (1861 & 1866), Hart’s Circle & Polar Duality¶
Historical Context of Casey’s Original Discoveries & Cross-Canon Links
1. John Casey’s Two Famous Memoirs (1861 & 1866)¶
Unit 4 preserves John Casey’s own most celebrated contributions to pure mathematics, integrated directly into a student textbook:
1861 Feuerbach Inversion Proof (:cite:`QJM 4, 1861 <casey:1861:feuerbach>`): When Karl Wilhelm Feuerbach proved his nine-point tangency theorem in 1822, his proof relied on heavy trigonometric computation. While still an undergraduate pensioner at Trinity College Dublin in 1860–1861, Casey noticed that the circle centered at $M_a$ of radius $\frac{1}{2}|b-c|$ cuts $(I)$ and $(I_a)$ orthogonally and inverts their fourth common tangent into the Nine-Points Circle! Immediately upon seeing Casey’s proof, Trinity Vice-Provost Andrew Searle Hart extended it to three arbitrary circles (QJM 4, 1861), discovering Hart’s Circle (Book VI, Sec. IV, Prop. 11).
1866 Generalized Ptolemy Theorem (:cite:`Proc. R.I.A. 9, 1866 <casey:1866:circles>`): Five years later, Casey discovered the bitangent criterion $\overline{12}\cdot\overline{34} \pm \overline{14}\cdot\overline{23} \pm \overline{13}\cdot\overline{24} = 0$ while investigating systems of circles touching three fixed circles on the plane and sphere—turning Feuerbach’s theorem into a three-line algebraic corollary! Note that for sufficiency, modern expositions (Zacharias, Altshiller-Court § 502) specify compatible contact orientations (signed radii), which
prove_casey_theorem_symbolic()verifies explicitly for both internal incircle and external excircle cases.
2. Cross-Canon Links (etc, altshiller-court, pappus)¶
Kimberling’s ETC (`geometor/etc`): The Feuerbach Point $F_e = X(11)$ has homogeneous barycentric coordinates $((b-c)^2(s-a) : (c-a)^2(s-b) : (a-b)^2(s-c))$. On our canonical $(15, 13, 14)$ triangle ($s = 21, s-a = 6, s-b = 8, s-c = 7$), these evaluate to $(1\cdot 6 : 1\cdot 8 : 4\cdot 7) = (3 : 4 : 14)$, yielding $\frac{3(0,0) + 4(14,0) + 14(5,12)}{21} = (6, 8)$—in 100% agreement with both the ray intersection of $[NI]$ ($x = 6$) with $(I, 4)$ and Casey’s orthogonal inversion of $T_s = \left(\frac{614}{65}, \frac{392}{65}\right)$ in $(M_a, \frac{1}{2})$!
Pappus & Polar Duality (`geometor/pappus`): Casey’s Section VII (pp. 141–147) supplies the metric-to-projective bridge whereby inscribed Pascal configurations in
geometor/pappusdualize via $(x_0 - h)(x - h) + (y_0 - k)(y - k) = r^2$ into circumscribed Brianchon hexagons.