Bibliography & Editions¶
Critical Greek Editions, Oxford Translations, Classical Treatises & Commentaries
Authoritative editions, translations, classical mathematical propositions, and commentaries cited across the primary apparatus and analytical notes of Loci Geometrici et Noetici.
Bekker, Immanuel (ed.) — Aristotelis Opera, edidit Academia Regia Borussica, Vols. I–II (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1831; Oxford repr. 1837)
Citation Key:
bekker:1831| Locus:1a–1462bSignificance: Canonical Greek critical text defining universal Bekker page, column (a/b), and line coordinates.
Ross, Sir William David (ed.) — Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924)
Citation Key:
ross:metaphysics:1924| Locus:980a–1093bSignificance: Standard critical Greek edition and commentary for Liber V of this Codex.
Ross, Sir William David (ed.) — Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936)
Citation Key:
ross:physics:1936| Locus:184a–267bSignificance: Standard critical commentary on Aristotle’s abstraction, infinite, place, and continuum treatises.
Ross, Sir William David (ed.) — Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949)
Citation Key:
ross:analytics:1949| Locus:24a–100bSignificance: Comprehensive philological and logical commentary on the Analytics.
Waitz, Theodor (ed.) — Aristotelis Organon Graece, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Hahn, 1844–1846)
Citation Key:
waitz:organon:1844| Locus:Vols. I–IISignificance: Nineteenth-century critical edition and Latin commentary cited throughout Heath and Hoenen.
Bonitz, Hermann — Index Aristotelicus, Aristotelis Opera Vol. V (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1870)
Citation Key:
bonitz:index:1870| Locus:pp. 1–878Significance: Exhaustive lexicon of Aristotle’s Greek philosophical and mathematical terminology.
Smith, J. A., and W. D. Ross (eds.) — The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, Vols. I–III, VIII (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908–1931)
Citation Key:
oxford:works:1908| Locus:Vols. I, II, III, VIIISignificance: Public-domain Oxford English translations by Edghill, Jenkinson, Mure, Pickard-Cambridge, Hardie & Gaye, Stocks, Smith, and Ross staged in this Codex.
Heath, Sir Thomas Little — The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, 2nd ed., 3 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 1926) [geometor/euclid]
Citation Key:
heath:euclid:1926| Locus:Vols. I–IIISignificance: Contains 145 distinct Aristotelian locus citations reconstructing pre-Euclidean definitions, postulates, and proofs.
Heath, Sir Thomas Little — Mathematics in Aristotle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949)
Citation Key:
heath:math-aristotle:1949| Locus:pp. 1–291Significance: Systematic treatise-by-treatise mathematical commentary on every geometrical and arithmetical passage in the Aristotelian corpus.
Hoenen, Petrus Hubertus Jacobus, S.J. — De Noetica Geometriae: Origine Theoriae Cognitionis, Analecta Gregoriana Vol. 56 (Rome: Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana, 1952) [geometor/hoenen]
Citation Key:
hoenen:noetica:1952| Locus:Cap. I–VII & AppendixSignificance: Contains 64 Aristotelian locus keys developing the noetics of intellectual intuition in the phantasm and intelligible matter.
Pacioli, Fra Luca, O.F.M. — De Divina Proportione (Venice: Paganino Paganini, 1509) [geometor/pacioli]
Citation Key:
pacioli:divina:1509| Locus:Compendio Cap. I–V & ArchitecturaSignificance: Renaissance treatise citing Aristotle on mathematical certitude, subalternation of perspective/music, and the five regular solids.
Euclid of Alexandria — Elements (Στοιχεῖα, ed. J. L. Heiberg, Leipzig, 1883–1888)
Citation Key:
euclid:elements| Locus:Books I–XIIISignificance: The canonical Greek synthesis of definitions, postulates, common notions, plane geometry, Eudoxian proportion, irrationals, and stereometry.
Euclid of Alexandria — Elements, Book I, Proposition 5 (Pons Asinorum)
Citation Key:
euclid:I.5| Locus:I.5Significance: Equality of base angles in an isosceles triangle; contrasted with Aristotle’s older mixed-angle proof in Prior Analytics I.24 (41b13–22).
Euclid of Alexandria — Elements, Book I, Postulate 5 & Proposition 29 (Theory of Parallels)
Citation Key:
euclid:I.29| Locus:Post. 5; I.27–29Significance: Euclid’s resolution of the circularity in parallel-line proofs diagnosed by Aristotle in Prior Analytics II.16 (65a4–9).
Euclid of Alexandria — Elements, Book I, Proposition 32 (Interior Angles of a Triangle = 2R)
Citation Key:
euclid:I.32| Locus:I.32Significance: Proved via the parallel through the vertex; cited in Posterior Analytics I.5 (74a25–32), I.31 (87b35), and Metaphysics Θ.9 (1051a24–26).
Euclid of Alexandria — Elements, Book III, Proposition 31 (Angle in a Semicircle is Right)
Citation Key:
euclid:III.31| Locus:III.31Significance: Proved in Metaphysics Θ.9 (1051a26–29) and Posterior Analytics II.11 (94a28–34) by erecting the radius from the center of the diameter.
Euclid of Alexandria / Eudoxus of Cnidus — Elements, Book V, Definition 5 & Proposition 16 (General Proportion & Alternation)
Citation Key:
euclid:V.def.5| Locus:V.Def.5; V.16Significance: General Eudoxian theory of proportion heralded in Posterior Analytics I.5 (74a17–25) as superseding separate proofs for numbers, lines, solids, and times.
Euclid of Alexandria / Theaetetus — Elements, Book X, Propositions 2–3 (Anthyphairetic Criterion of Incommensurability)
Citation Key:
euclid:X.2| Locus:X.2–3Significance: Geometric preservation of reciprocal subtraction (antanairesis), attested in Topics VIII.3 (158b29–35).
Plato — Meno
Citation Key:
plato:meno| Locus:80d–86cSignificance: Meno’s paradox of inquiry and the geometric doubling of the square, explicitly answered in Posterior Analytics I.1 (71a29).
Plato — Republic, Books VI–VII (Divided Line & Quadrivium)
Citation Key:
plato:republic| Locus:509d–511e, 525a–534dSignificance: Distinction between discursive mathematical dianoia from hypotheses and dialectical noēsis.
Plato — Timaeus
Citation Key:
plato:timaeus| Locus:48e–56cSignificance: Identification of receptacle space (chōra) with matter and construction of physical bodies out of elementary plane triangles—critiqued in Physics IV.2 and De Caelo III.7–8.
Proclus Diadochus — In Primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentarii (ed. G. Friedlein, Leipzig, 1873)
Citation Key:
proclus:in-euclidem| Locus:pp. 48–84, 178–207Significance: Preserves the Eudemian summary of Greek geometry and compares Aristotelian axioms, postulates, and hypotheses with Euclid’s Elements.
Alexander of Aphrodisias — In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria (ed. M. Hayduck, CAG I, Berlin, 1891)
Citation Key:
alexander:in-metaph| Locus:CAG ISignificance: Classical Peripatetic commentary on Metaphysics A–Δ (with pseudo-Alexander / Michael of Ephesus on E–N).
Simplicius of Cilicia — In Aristotelis Physicorum Libros Commentaria (ed. H. Diels, CAG IX–X, Berlin, 1882–1895)
Citation Key:
simplicius:in-physica| Locus:CAG IX–XSignificance: Essential source on Antiphon, Bryson, Hippocrates of Chios, and Zeno’s continuum arguments.
John Philoponus — In Aristotelis Analytica Priora et Posteriora Commentaria (ed. M. Wallies, CAG XIII.2–3, Berlin, 1905–1909)
Citation Key:
philoponus:in-anal-post| Locus:CAG XIII.2–3Significance: Preserves ancient reconstructions of Aristotle’s geometric examples in the Analytics.
Thomas Aquinas, St., O.P. — Expositio Libri Posteriorum Analyticorum (Leonine ed., Vol. I*2, Rome, 1989)
Citation Key:
aquinas:in-anal-post| Locus:Lib. I–IISignificance: Scholastic exposition of demonstrative science, axioms vs. postulates, subalternation, and intuitive epagōgē.
Thomas Aquinas, St., O.P. — Super Boethium De Trinitate (Leonine ed., Vol. L, Rome, 1992)
Citation Key:
aquinas:in-boeth-trin| Locus:qq. 5–6Significance: Locus classicus on the three degrees of theoretical distinction/abstraction and the termination of mathematical judgment in the imagination (ad imaginationem).
Averroes (Ibn Rushd) — Aristotelis Metaphysicorum Libri XIIII cum Averrois Cordubensis in eosdem Commentariis (Venice: Junta, 1562)
Citation Key:
averroes:in-metaph| Locus:Lib. II, comm. 14–16Significance: Classical Peripatetic-Arabic exposition of Metaphysics α.3 (995a14–17) on mathematical exactitude (akribeia) and abstraction from sensible matter.
Hilbert, David — Grundlagen der Geometrie (Leipzig: Teubner, 1899)
Citation Key:
hilbert:grundlagen:1899| Locus:Chs. I–IISignificance: Modern formalist axiomatization contrasted with Aristotelian intuitive first principles in the Codex commentary.